Print

Hazrat Ali Ibn Abi Talib (RA) narrated that the Messenger of Allah (SAW) said “Do not tell a lie against me for whoever tells a lie against me (intentionally) then he will surely enter the Hell-fire.” (Sahih Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 3, #106) This is the extent of forging sayings to the Holy Prophet Muhammad (SAW) and yet

We find the like of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad blatantly fabricating ahadith to support his position.

For example, he claims “it appears from the Ahadith that the Mahdi of the latter days will first be rejected as kafir and people will turn against him and will revile him.” (The Essence of Islam, Volume 4, Page 213)  This is a blatant lie and notice he uses the plural ahadith and not the singular hadith. In actual fact, allegiance to Imam Mahdi will be against his will as per the saying, “...some of the people of Mecca will come to him, bring him out against his will and swear allegiance to him between the corner and the maqam... He will remain seven years, then die, and the Muslims will pray over him.” (Sunan Abu Dawud, Book 36, #4273)  How can one then propose that Imam Mahdi will be rejected as an unbeliever as per the belief of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad which he attributes to the Holy Prophet Muhammad (SAW)?

The only reason he intentionally fabricated this “hadith” is to support his position. The fact is that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was rejected, reviled and labelled an unbeliever. He therefore fabricated this saying to support his rejection. The Muslim population of India, statistically, was 98% illiterate and therefore unable to corroborate his forgery. We ask, Ahmadis, where is this “hadith”? The abode of an intentional fabricator of a single hadith is Hell.